The idea that work has meaning and is meaningful beyond its contribution to consumption
has been largely absent from mainstream economics. This paper gives reasons
for why mainstream economics has neglected the idea of meaningful work. It
identifies the idea of the disutility of work, the assumption of free choice on the part
of workers and the use of a formal and individualistic method as key constraints on
the ability of mainstream economics to incorporate the idea of meaningful work. It
also addresses the contribution of happiness economics and shows how it is unable
to encompass the idea of meaningful work. Ideas on work from heterodox economics
are then discussed. These ideas provide essential insight and inspiration for the
incorporation of the idea of meaningful work into the economics of work. In all
respects, the paper seeks to contribute towards the development and promotion of
a heterodox economics of work that has the goal of meaningful work at its centre.
|